The chair can get unanimous agreement and ask if there are any objections to be made. For example, the chair may say, „If there is no objection, the motion will be accepted. [Pause] As there is no objection, the motion is accepted. [1] In Westminster parliaments could be the phrase „There is no objection, leave is granted.“ In the most routine cases, such as inserting an article into the minutes of Congress, the President can reduce this statement to four words: „No objection, so ordered“ or even two words: „No contradiction“ (in Latin: nemine contradicente). Another example of this practice in the House of Representatives is when a certain number of votes have been interrupted by a speaker or other company. The Chair will declare that the vote will continue without objection. Bill`s leadership appears to have encouraged the initiative to grant unanimous approval agreements. Their growing commitment in the following decades prompted a senator, Roger Mills, D-TX to complain that the Senate „gets its vote on all issues like the historic Reichstag of Poland, by the unanimous approval of the whole and not by the act of majority.“ 7 Other issues related to these early agreements have also caused confusion among members. Many complaints stem from the fact that the first unanimous approval agreements were often „seen as a mere agreement between gentlemen“ and that, as one pro tempore president put it, „any member of the Senate could be violated with impunity.“ 8 To reduce confusion, the Senate passed a new regulation. Objections are sometimes used as a delaying tactic. The opponent cannot agree with the proposal under consideration, but chooses to object in order to impose a formal vote that takes time and may include a period of debate.
[9] Over the following decades, the Senate experienced increasing application of unanimous approval agreements. Today`s Senate regularly works on the terms of the approval agreements unanimously. They are used in all measures or matters before the Senate and, at least since the Second World War, all party leaders and land officials have relied heavily on them to deal with the affairs of the House. During Senator Lyndon Johnson`s majority leadership, D-TX (1955-1960), unanimous approval agreements were often comprehensive (for example. (b) the date on which a measure is to be used, the date on which the final passage is to be voted and the applicable procedures between these two phases). Each invoice receives three readings [before adoption]; and the president [of the Senate] gives to everyone, whether it is the first, the second or the third; readings take place on three different days, unless the Senate unanimously orders otherwise. Given their importance to the chamber`s activities, it is worth understanding the context or origin of the unanimous approval agreements.